Halstonberg
consumer legal coverage

FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information reporting: where the Corporate Transparency Act actually stands in 2026

Kenji TanakaReviewed by Conor P. Brennan, Legal ResearcherMay 10, 202617 min
FinCEN BOICorporate Transparency ActBeneficial OwnershipNY LLC Transparency Act

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), enacted in 2021 and originally scheduled to take effect January 1, 2024, was designed to bring the United States in line with international anti-money-laundering standards by requiring every domestic corporation, limited liability company, and similar entity to report Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The original rule covered approximately 32 million existing entities plus all new entities formed going forward, requiring disclosure of beneficial owners' names, dates of birth, addresses, and identifying numbers. The compliance burden on small businesses was substantial, and the rule generated significant legal challenges that fundamentally reshaped its scope.

The history from January 2024 through May 2026 has been one of the most volatile regulatory rollouts in recent memory. The reporting deadline was originally January 1, 2025 for pre-2024 entities. A federal district court issued a nationwide injunction in December 2024 (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland). The Supreme Court stayed that injunction in January 2025. A second district court issued a separate injunction in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury that February. The Smith injunction was lifted, the deadline was pushed to March 21, 2025, and then on March 21, 2025, FinCEN issued an interim final rule that fundamentally restructured the framework. Under the interim final rule, all U.S.-formed entities are now exempt from BOI reporting. Only foreign reporting companies (entities formed under the law of a foreign country that have registered to do business in any U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction) remain subject to the requirements.

The federal exemption hasn't ended the broader trend, though. State legislatures have started enacting their own transparency requirements that operate independently of the federal framework. New York's LLC Transparency Act took effect January 1, 2026, and several other states have similar legislation in various stages of development. The compliance environment for U.S. businesses in 2026 is therefore narrower than originally anticipated under the federal CTA but broader than the federal exemption alone suggests because of the rising state-level patchwork.

This is the current federal framework, the surviving state requirements, what to do about each, and the strategic considerations for business owners navigating a regulatory landscape that has moved repeatedly and may move again.

What changed with the federal CTA in March 2025?

FinCEN's March 26, 2025 interim final rule exempted all U.S.-formed entities from BOI reporting. Only foreign-formed companies registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction must file. The rule eliminated federal reporting obligations for approximately 32 million domestic LLCs, corporations, and similar entities.

The interim final rule published on March 26, 2025 revised the regulatory definition of "reporting company" to mean only entities formed under the law of a foreign country that have registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction. All entities created in the United States are exempt from BOI reporting.

The practical effect:

Domestic LLCs, corporations, and similar entities formed in any U.S. state or under federal law have no federal BOI reporting requirement. This includes virtually every small business operating in the United States, including single-member LLCs, multi-member LLCs, S-corporations, C-corporations, and similar entities formed by U.S. persons or U.S. residents.

Foreign reporting companies that have registered to do business in any U.S. state still must file BOI reports. These include entities formed in foreign jurisdictions (like a Cayman Islands company or a UK Ltd) that have registered with a U.S. Secretary of State to do business in that state. The deadline for foreign reporting companies that existed before the interim rule was 30 days from publication; foreign companies registering to do business in the U.S. after April 25, 2025 generally have 30 days from registration to file.

No federal BOI report needs to be filed unless an entity falls into the foreign reporting company category. Domestic entities that already filed BOI reports under the original CTA framework can simply leave those filings in place; no further action is required from them.

The interim final rule is technically "interim" because FinCEN accepted public comments for 60 days after publication and is expected to issue a final rule sometime in 2026. FinCEN previously indicated intent to finalize by late 2025, but as of May 2026 that hasn't happened. The agency has acknowledged that the final rule may retain the narrowed scope rather than restoring domestic reporting.

What happens to existing BOI reports already filed with FinCEN?

BOI reports filed by domestic entities before March 2025 remain on file at FinCEN but require no updates or maintenance. No follow-up filings are needed when ownership changes, no annual reports are due, and entities that never filed before the exemption took effect are not required to submit reports now.

For domestic entities that already submitted BOI reports under the original framework (filed between January 2024 and March 2025 before the exemption took effect):

The filings remain in place at FinCEN but the reporting obligation no longer applies. No update reports need to be filed when ownership changes occur. No annual reports are required.

If circumstances change for the entity (it becomes a foreign reporting company through some restructuring), the new reporting obligations under the foreign reporting company framework would apply. For most domestic entities this won't be relevant.

FinCEN has not announced any plan to delete or expunge previously filed reports. The data remains in FinCEN's system but isn't being actively maintained or supplemented through ongoing reporting.

For entities that didn't file before the exemption took effect, no filing is required now. The original CTA's penalties for failure to file (civil fines up to $591 per day) and criminal penalties (up to two years imprisonment and $10,000 fines for willful violations) are not being enforced against domestic entities under the current framework.

Is the Corporate Transparency Act constitutional?

Yes. The Eleventh Circuit unanimously upheld the CTA's constitutionality in late 2025, finding it a valid exercise of congressional authority under multiple constitutional provisions. The current narrow reporting scope reflects regulatory policy choices by the Treasury Department, not constitutional deficiency, meaning the framework could legally be expanded again by a future administration or Congress.

While the federal exemption was being finalized, the broader constitutional challenge to the CTA continued. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a ruling in late 2025 unanimously upholding the CTA's constitutionality against arguments that it exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. The court found that the CTA was a valid exercise of congressional authority under multiple constitutional provisions.

The practical implication: the CTA remains a properly adopted federal law. The current narrow scope reflects regulatory and policy choices by the Treasury Department under the interim final rule, not constitutional invalidity. If a future administration or Congress wanted to expand the reporting framework back to its original scope, the constitutional foundation is established.

This matters strategically because the framework could change again. Reporting obligations have been added, removed, paused, and restored multiple times in 18 months. Business owners who set up systems to track beneficial ownership information should consider keeping those systems in place even if no current filings are required, because the regulatory environment has demonstrated capacity to shift quickly.

Which states have their own beneficial ownership reporting laws?

New York's LLC Transparency Act, effective January 1, 2026, requires LLCs to file beneficial ownership information with the state. California, Maine, Massachusetts, and other states have similar legislation in various stages. Even with federal reporting narrowed to foreign entities only, state-level requirements are creating a growing patchwork of compliance obligations for U.S. businesses.

While the federal framework narrowed, state-level beneficial ownership requirements have started emerging:

New York's LLC Transparency Act took effect January 1, 2026. The Act requires LLCs (both domestic New York LLCs and foreign LLCs registered to do business in New York) to file beneficial ownership information with the New York Department of State. Key features:

The reporting requirements apply to LLCs only, not corporations.

The reporting standard is essentially identical to the original federal CTA: full legal name, date of birth, current business address, and unique identifying number from an acceptable identification document for each beneficial owner.

Existing LLCs (formed before January 1, 2026) have until January 1, 2027 to file initial reports.

LLCs formed on or after January 1, 2026 must file beneficial ownership information at the time of formation.

Updates are required when beneficial ownership changes.

Information is held by the Department of State and is not generally publicly accessible, though it can be disclosed to law enforcement, certain government agencies, and pursuant to court orders.

Civil penalties for non-compliance can reach $250 per day with a maximum of $10,000 per year, plus potential suspension of business operations.

California had similar legislation under consideration (AB 1183) but it didn't pass in the 2023-24 session. Updated versions are being reintroduced.

Maine, Massachusetts, and several other states have similar proposals in various legislative stages.

The pattern suggests that even with federal CTA narrowed to foreign entities, business owners operating in multiple states will face an expanding patchwork of state-level beneficial ownership reporting requirements over the coming years.

What should domestic business owners do about BOI reporting in 2026?

Most U.S. business owners have no federal BOI filing obligation in 2026. The key steps are confirming your entity is domestically formed (and therefore exempt), complying with any applicable state requirements like New York's LLC Transparency Act, and maintaining internal beneficial ownership records in case the regulatory framework shifts again.

Given the current state of the federal framework and the rising state-level requirements, the practical approach for most U.S. business owners:

Confirm no federal BOI report is currently required for your entity. If you operate a U.S.-formed LLC or corporation owned by U.S. persons, you're exempt from federal BOI reporting. No filing is needed. If you previously filed a BOI report, no follow-up action is required.

Maintain beneficial ownership records internally even without filing obligation. The records you would have compiled to comply with the original CTA (beneficial owner names, dates of birth, addresses, ID numbers, ownership percentages) remain valuable for several reasons: state-level reporting may require them (NY already does for LLCs), state of formation may begin requiring them in the future, the federal framework could revert to domestic reporting if future regulatory action changes course, and the records are useful for general business governance regardless of reporting requirements.

Comply with applicable state requirements. If you operate an LLC in New York, plan to comply with the LLC Transparency Act before the January 1, 2027 deadline for existing entities. The information required is essentially the same as what would have been filed with FinCEN; the process is just routed to the New York Department of State instead.

Monitor for state-level developments. Each state's beneficial ownership reporting timeline is separate. Business owners with operations in multiple states should monitor for new requirements in each jurisdiction.

Foreign entities still must file federal BOI reports. If your business structure includes any foreign-formed entity registered to do business in any U.S. state, BOI reporting at the federal level is still required for that foreign entity. The narrowed CTA scope only exempts domestic entities, not foreign ones.

What about the original CTA filings?

Original CTA filings submitted by domestic entities remain on file at FinCEN but require no maintenance. No update filings are needed, no annual reports are due, and no penalties apply to domestic entities that never filed. The data is not publicly accessible; disclosure is limited to government agencies and law enforcement.

For business owners who filed BOI reports under the original CTA before the March 2025 exemption took effect, the filings remain on file at FinCEN but no maintenance is required. Specifically:

No update filings are required when ownership changes occur for domestic entities.

No annual reports are required for domestic entities.

FinCEN is not actively maintaining the data through ongoing reporting from domestic entities.

The data is not publicly accessible under FinCEN's information access rules. Disclosure is limited to specific government agencies and law enforcement.

For domestic entities that haven't yet filed, no filing is required. The exemption applies regardless of whether you started preparing to file under the original framework.

How much does BOI reporting compliance cost?

The federal exemption eliminated substantial compliance costs for approximately 32 million domestic entities. FinCEN had estimated original filings would take 90 minutes to 12 hours per entity. State-level requirements like New York's LLC Transparency Act reintroduce similar compliance burdens, and multi-state businesses may face compounding costs across jurisdictions.

The original CTA was projected to impose significant compliance costs on small businesses. FinCEN estimated initial filings would take approximately 90 minutes per entity for simple structures and up to 12 hours for complex structures. Updates were required within 30 days of any beneficial ownership change.

The exemption removes these direct compliance costs for the approximately 32 million domestic entities that would have been subject to the framework. Estimates suggest the exemption saves U.S. small businesses billions of dollars in compliance costs annually.

The trade-off: state-level requirements that fill the gap will impose similar (though smaller-scale) compliance burdens on businesses operating in jurisdictions that adopt their own beneficial ownership reporting. New York's framework requires the same data elements as the federal CTA would have, just filed with a different agency.

For multi-state operations, the compliance picture becomes more complex than either pure federal or pure state-level reporting would be. A business with LLCs registered in New York, California, and other states may face different reporting requirements in each state, with different deadlines, different forms, and different penalty structures.

What other federal anti-money-laundering obligations still apply?

The BOI reporting exemption does not eliminate other federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Bank customer identification programs, currency transaction reports for cash transactions over $10,000, suspicious activity reports, and FBAR filings for foreign financial accounts all continue under separate authorities unrelated to the CTA.

The BOI reporting exemption doesn't eliminate all federal anti-money-laundering obligations. Several related requirements continue:

ObligationWhat It RequiresLegal Authority
Bank Customer Identification Programs (CIP)Financial institutions opening accounts for legal entities must collect beneficial ownership information from those entities as bank-level due diligence31 CFR §1010.230
Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs)Reports filed for cash transactions over $10,000Bank Secrecy Act
Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)Banks report suspicious patterns observed in business accounts, which may trigger investigationBank Secrecy Act
FBAR filingsU.S. persons with foreign financial accounts must file Foreign Bank Account ReportsSeparate statutory authority unrelated to CTA

The narrowed CTA scope doesn't change any of these. Business owners should continue to understand and comply with the broader anti-money-laundering framework even with BOI reporting exempted for domestic entities.

What might change with BOI reporting going forward?

The current framework is interim and subject to change from multiple directions. FinCEN may finalize the rule in 2026, a future administration could direct expanded reporting, Congress could amend the CTA, pending litigation could alter the framework, and additional states are likely to enact their own transparency laws in the near term.

The current framework is described as "interim" for good reason. Several developments could change the landscape:

FinCEN's final rule. The Treasury Department is expected to finalize the interim rule sometime in 2026. The final version could retain the narrow scope, expand it to cover some domestic entities, or take some intermediate approach.

Future administration changes. A different administration could direct FinCEN to revert to broader reporting requirements. The constitutional foundation under the Eleventh Circuit ruling allows this; only regulatory choices currently limit the scope.

Congressional action. Congress could amend the underlying CTA to require domestic reporting by statute, removing the regulatory flexibility that has produced the current narrow scope.

Continued litigation. Several CTA-related lawsuits are still pending in various courts. Future rulings could affect the framework.

State-level expansion. Additional states are likely to enact LLC transparency laws similar to New York's, creating an increasingly comprehensive state-level patchwork.

For business owners, the strategic posture is to comply with what's currently required (state-level requirements where applicable, foreign reporting company requirements at federal level for relevant entities), maintain beneficial ownership records internally even without current filing obligations, and stay aware of developments because the framework has demonstrated capacity to change quickly and may do so again.

What should you do this week if you operate a U.S. business?

Verify your entity is U.S.-formed and therefore exempt from federal BOI reporting. Do not file a federal report unless you are a foreign reporting company. If you operate a New York LLC, prepare for the LLC Transparency Act deadline. Maintain internal beneficial ownership records regardless of current filing obligations.

The realistic to-do list:

Verify your entity is U.S.-formed and not a foreign reporting company. The exemption applies to entities formed under U.S. state or federal law. If your entity is foreign-formed and registered to do business in the U.S., federal BOI reporting still applies.

Don't file a federal BOI report unless you're a foreign reporting company. The form is no longer accepting filings from domestic entities, and submitting unnecessary information creates record-keeping issues without legal benefit.

If you're a New York LLC, plan for the LLC Transparency Act compliance before January 1, 2027 (for existing entities) or upon formation (for new entities formed on or after January 1, 2026).

Maintain internal records of beneficial ownership information regardless of current filing obligations. The data elements you would have needed for federal CTA compliance are valuable for ongoing governance and may be needed for state-level filings or future federal changes.

For complex business structures with foreign components, work with counsel familiar with both federal CTA requirements (which still apply to foreign reporting companies) and the relevant state-level requirements. The interaction between federal and state frameworks for entities with multi-jurisdictional structures requires careful analysis that varies by specific situation.

For straightforward U.S.-formed LLCs and corporations owned by U.S. persons doing business in single states without specialized requirements, the compliance burden in 2026 is essentially zero at the federal level. The relief from the original CTA framework is meaningful and represents one of the most consequential rollbacks of small business regulatory burden in recent years. The trade-off is the rising state-level patchwork that will require monitoring as more states enact their own transparency frameworks over the coming years.

When the entity itself winds down, BOI obligations are only one piece of the closure picture. The federal-level reporting framework has narrowed for 2026, but the state filing that formally ends the LLC's legal existence still has to happen on its own track. For the state-by-state procedure, see how to dissolve an LLC.

Kenji TanakaSmall Business & Compliance

Kenji has spent over a decade breaking down business formation, entity compliance, and dissolution across all 50 states. He has personally walked through the LLC closure process and translates dense state filing rules into plain steps anyone can follow.

Reviewed by Conor P. Brennan, Legal Researcher
General information, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Laws and procedures vary by state and change over time, and every situation is different. Confirm current rules with the relevant agency or court, and consult a licensed attorney or other qualified professional before acting on anything you read here.

More in Small Business
Small business12 min
IRC §280A home office deduction: the exclusive-use rule, the principal-place-of-business test, the simplified method, and the depreciation recapture that catches people on sale
Kenji Tanaka · reviewed by Conor P. Brennan, Legal Researcher
Small business12 min
IRC §721 partnership contribution: tax-free property transfers, the investment company exception, services as non-property, and how it differs from §351
Kenji Tanaka · reviewed by Conor P. Brennan, Legal Researcher
Small business12 min
IRC §263(a) tangible property capitalization: the de minimis safe harbor, small taxpayer election, routine maintenance framework, and how to actually tell a repair from an improvement
Kenji Tanaka · reviewed by Conor P. Brennan, Legal Researcher