Halstonberg
consumer legal coverage

Indiana Second Chance Law: how IC 35-38-9 expungement actually works across five sections

Emeka O. OkaforReviewed by Bridget Vogel, JDMay 18, 202616 min
Indiana ExpungementIndiana Second Chance LawIC 35-38-9Indiana Criminal Record

Indiana operates one of the more distinctive criminal record relief frameworks in the country through the Second Chance Law, codified at Indiana Code 35-38-9. The framework uses a five-section structure that distinguishes between different categories of criminal records and applies different procedural rules, waiting periods, and substantive standards to each category. Section 1 covers arrests and charges that didn't lead to conviction. Section 2 covers misdemeanors and Class D/Level 6 felonies reduced to misdemeanors. Section 3 covers Class D/Level 6 felonies that weren't reduced. Section 4 covers most other felony convictions including some that resulted in serious bodily injury. Section 5 covers the most serious felonies.

What makes the Indiana framework distinctive is the combination of mandatory and discretionary procedures, the prosecutor consent option for early filing, the anti-discrimination provision under IC 35-38-9-10, and the "one-bite" rule that limits each person to a single round of expungement requests for most categories. The framework allows substantial relief for qualifying convictions while imposing procedural constraints that prevent strategic filing and refiling. The anti-discrimination provision is particularly distinctive — it makes employment discrimination based on expunged records unlawful and provides civil remedies for violations.

The framework uses "expunge" terminology but the substantive effect is sealing rather than destruction. Records expunged under IC 35-38-9 are sealed from public access and most background checks, but the records continue to exist and remain accessible to law enforcement, courts, and certain government entities. Indiana residents can typically answer "no" to questions about expunged convictions in employment applications and similar contexts, with the anti-discrimination provision providing additional protection if the truthful answer is challenged.

This is how the Indiana framework actually works across the five sections, the eligibility criteria and waiting periods for each, the procedural sequence including prosecutor consent options, the anti-discrimination protections, and the strategic considerations for Indiana residents seeking record relief.

Section 1: Arrests and charges not leading to conviction

Under IC 35-38-9-1, individuals with arrests or criminal charges that didn't lead to conviction can petition for expungement:

Eligibility:

  • The person was arrested but charges were never filed
  • Charges were filed but were later dismissed (without conviction)
  • The person was acquitted at trial
  • Juvenile delinquency allegations that resulted in adjudication for an infraction (post-July 1, 2022 amendment)

Waiting period. One year after the arrest, dismissal, or acquittal.

Filing fee. No filing fee for Section 1 expungements. This is one of the distinctive features — most expungement procedures involve filing fees.

Procedural framework. Petition filed in the court that handled the original case (or where the arrest occurred if no charges were filed). Standard expungement procedure applies but with simplified requirements given the absence of conviction.

Effect. Records are sealed and the petitioner can legally deny the arrest occurred in most contexts. The records are permanently inaccessible to standard background checks.

For Indiana residents with arrests or dismissed charges, Section 1 expungement is typically straightforward and represents the most accessible form of relief under the framework. The one-year waiting period is short, no filing fee applies, and the procedural framework is simplified.

Section 2: Misdemeanors and reduced felonies

Under IC 35-38-9-2, individuals convicted of misdemeanors or Class D/Level 6 felonies that were subsequently reduced to misdemeanors can petition for expungement:

Eligibility:

  • Misdemeanor convictions (Class A, B, and C misdemeanors)
  • Level 6 Felony (or Class D Felony) convictions reduced to misdemeanors under IC 35-38-1-1.5 or IC 35-50-2-7

Waiting period. Five years from the date of conviction, unless the prosecuting attorney consents in writing to an earlier filing.

Filing fee. A filing fee is required (typically $156 plus court costs).

Requirements:

  • All fines, fees, restitution, and court costs must be paid in full
  • No pending criminal charges
  • No convictions for any other crime during the five-year waiting period

Prosecutor consent option. The prosecutor can consent in writing to an earlier filing, allowing expungement before the five-year waiting period elapses. The consent decision is at the prosecutor's discretion.

Procedure. Petition filed in the court of conviction. The prosecutor has the opportunity to respond. If the prosecutor doesn't object, the court typically grants the petition. If the prosecutor objects or the court has concerns, a hearing is held.

Effect. Records are sealed but remain accessible to law enforcement and certain government entities. The petitioner can typically deny the conviction in most non-government contexts.

For Indiana residents with misdemeanor convictions, Section 2 expungement is the typical path to relief. The five-year waiting period is relatively short compared to other states' frameworks, and the prosecutor consent option allows for accelerated relief in appropriate cases.

Section 3: Level 6/Class D felonies not reduced

Under IC 35-38-9-3, individuals convicted of Level 6/Class D felonies that weren't reduced to misdemeanors can petition for expungement:

Eligibility. Level 6 felonies (or Class D felonies under the prior felony classification system) where the conviction wasn't reduced to a misdemeanor.

Waiting period. Eight years from the date of conviction, unless the prosecutor consents in writing to an earlier filing. If the conviction is modified to a misdemeanor between conviction and petition, the waiting period reduces to five years.

Exclusions:

  • Felony battery convictions
  • Criminal recklessness convictions
  • Perjury convictions
  • Official misconduct convictions

Requirements:

  • All fines, fees, restitution, and court costs paid
  • No pending criminal charges
  • No new convictions during the eight-year waiting period

Filing fee. Required.

Prosecutor consent. Available for earlier filing.

Procedure. Petition filed in court of conviction. The court has discretion to grant or deny based on petition merits and prosecutor response.

Effect. Records sealed; similar substantive effect to Section 2 expungement.

For Indiana residents with Level 6 felony convictions for non-violent offenses without the specific exclusions, Section 3 expungement provides path to relief after the eight-year waiting period (or earlier with prosecutor consent).

Section 4: Mid-level felony convictions

Under IC 35-38-9-4, individuals convicted of higher-level felonies (Levels 1-5 felonies, or Class A-C felonies under the prior system) including some serious offenses can petition for expungement:

Eligibility. Level 1-5 felonies or Class A-C felonies, including felony battery and criminal recklessness convictions (which are excluded from Section 3 but included in Section 4).

Exclusion. Felonies that resulted in serious bodily injury to a person are excluded from Section 4 — those fall under Section 5.

Waiting period. Eight years from the date of conviction OR three years from completion of the sentence (whichever is later), unless the prosecutor consents in writing to an earlier filing.

Requirements:

  • All fines, fees, restitution, court costs paid
  • No pending criminal charges
  • No new convictions during the waiting period
  • The court must find that expungement is in the interest of justice

Procedural framework. More complex than Section 2 and 3. The court has substantial discretion to deny petitions based on the totality of circumstances, including the nature of the offense, the petitioner's rehabilitation, and similar factors. Prosecutor opposition often results in denial.

Effect. Records sealed; similar substantive effect to lower section expungements.

For Section 4 cases, the procedural threshold is higher than for Sections 2 and 3. Petitioners typically need stronger rehabilitation evidence and professional representation to obtain favorable outcomes.

Section 5: Higher-level felony convictions

Under IC 35-38-9-5, individuals convicted of Level 1-5 felonies or Class A-C felonies including those resulting in serious bodily injury can petition for expungement:

Eligibility. Higher-level felonies including those that resulted in serious bodily injury to a person.

Categorical exclusions. Several offense categories are categorically excluded from Section 5 expungement:

  • Sex offenders (as defined in IC 11-8-8-5)
  • Violent offenders (as defined in IC 35-50-2-2)
  • Convictions for rape (IC 35-42-4-1)
  • Child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3)
  • Child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or (c))
  • Vicarious sexual gratification
  • Two separate felony convictions involving unlawful use of deadly weapon
  • Various other categorically excluded offenses

Waiting period. Ten years from the date of conviction, plus the prosecutor's consent in writing to file for expungement.

Requirements:

  • All fines, fees, restitution, court costs paid
  • No pending criminal charges
  • No new convictions during the waiting period
  • Prosecutor's written consent

Procedure. The most procedurally demanding category. The court has substantial discretion, the prosecutor's consent is required (not just optional), and the standard for granting is the most stringent.

Effect. Records sealed when granted; substantive effect similar to other sections.

For Section 5 cases, the prosecutor consent requirement (not just option) means that without the prosecutor's cooperation, expungement isn't available. The framework essentially gives prosecutors veto power over Section 5 expungement, which limits relief in cases involving the most serious offenses.

The anti-discrimination provision under §10

IC 35-38-9-10 is one of the most distinctive features of the Indiana framework:

Anti-discrimination protection. It is unlawful to discriminate against any person because that person's records have been expunged under this chapter.

Employment protection. Employers cannot:

  • Inquire about expunged convictions in employment applications
  • Take adverse action against employees based on expunged convictions
  • Use expunged convictions as factors in hiring, firing, promotion, or compensation decisions

Housing protection. Landlords cannot:

  • Inquire about expunged convictions in rental applications
  • Refuse to rent based on expunged convictions
  • Take adverse action against tenants based on expunged convictions

Right to deny. Persons whose records have been expunged can legally answer "no" to questions about whether they have been convicted of a crime, except in very limited circumstances (specific government licensing in sensitive fields, etc.).

Civil remedies. Violations of the anti-discrimination provision allow for civil action with potential recovery including:

  • Actual damages
  • Punitive damages
  • Attorney's fees

Limited exceptions. Some specific contexts (law enforcement employment, judicial employment, certain other government roles, certain professional licensing) allow consideration of expunged records, but these exceptions are narrow.

The anti-discrimination provision provides substantive protection beyond what sealing alone would provide. The civil remedy framework gives individuals tools to enforce the protection if employers or landlords violate it.

The one-bite rule

A distinctive feature of the Indiana framework is the "one-bite" rule — generally, each person can only go through the expungement process once. Specifically:

Single petition rule. A person who has had records expunged generally can't have additional records expunged through subsequent petitions for the same offense categories.

Comprehensive filing requirement. When filing for expungement, the petitioner should typically include all eligible convictions and arrests rather than filing separately for each. Subsequent filings for the same categories may be denied based on the one-bite rule.

Coordinated petitions. Petitions covering multiple offense categories require careful coordination because each category has different waiting periods. A petition might cover misdemeanors (Section 2) that are immediately eligible but exclude felonies (Sections 3-5) that haven't yet met waiting periods.

Strategic timing. The one-bite rule creates strategic complexity. Filing too early limits future options; waiting too long means longer periods with records still appearing on background checks. Coordination with experienced counsel helps navigate the timing decisions.

The procedural sequence

For Indiana residents pursuing expungement:

Confirm eligibility. Review each conviction or arrest against the eligibility criteria for the relevant section. Identify which sections apply and what waiting periods govern.

Complete all financial obligations. Pay all fines, fees, restitution, and court costs before filing. Outstanding obligations prevent expungement.

Obtain criminal history. Request Indiana State Police criminal history report (approximately $15-20). The report shows current status of all Indiana records.

Coordinate with prosecutor (when applicable). For early filing or Section 5 (where prosecutor consent is required), discussions with the prosecuting attorney's office can determine whether consent is available. The prosecutor's response often determines case outcomes.

Prepare comprehensive petition. Given the one-bite rule, include all eligible convictions and arrests in a single comprehensive petition. The petition should specifically identify each case, the applicable section of IC 35-38-9, the relevant waiting period, and supporting documentation.

File in court of conviction. Petitions are filed in the court that handled the original case (or where the arrest occurred for non-conviction Section 1 cases).

Notice and prosecutor response. The prosecutor has the right to respond. Some prosecutors agree to uncontested orders; others actively oppose certain petitions.

Court hearing if contested. If contested, the court holds a hearing where the petitioner presents evidence supporting expungement and the prosecutor presents opposing evidence.

Court order. If granted, the order seals the records. The court forwards the order to Indiana State Police, court clerks, and other relevant agencies.

Implementation. The records are sealed in state databases. Verification through updated criminal history reports confirms implementation.

The typical timeline from filing to implementation is 3-6 months for uncontested cases, longer for contested cases.

How Indiana compares to other state frameworks

The Indiana framework has distinctive features:

Compared to Michigan's Clean Slate (Public Act 193 of 2020 with automatic set-aside): Michigan provides automatic relief; Indiana requires petition for all relief. Michigan's framework is broader in automatic procedures.

Compared to Pennsylvania's Clean Slate: Pennsylvania has automatic sealing for many cases; Indiana doesn't have automatic provisions.

Compared to Ohio's framework (R.C. §2953.32 post-SB 288): Ohio provides true expungement (destruction) for many cases; Indiana provides sealing only despite "expunge" terminology.

Compared to Illinois expungement/sealing: Both states distinguish between expungement and sealing in some form. Illinois has the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act automatic expungement that Indiana doesn't have. Indiana has the anti-discrimination provision that Illinois doesn't replicate.

Compared to Texas and Virginia post-Clean Slate Act: Both have automatic procedures that Indiana lacks. Indiana's framework is petition-only.

Distinctive Indiana features:

  • Anti-discrimination provision under §10
  • One-bite rule limiting repeat filings
  • Prosecutor consent option for early filing
  • Five-section structure with different rules per category

The broader national framework is covered in our state-by-state expungement framework overview. Indiana represents a middle-of-the-road state framework that's neither among the most progressive nor the most restrictive.

Strategic considerations

For Indiana residents pursuing expungement:

Plan comprehensively for the one-bite rule. Given the limitation on repeat filings, include all eligible records in a single comprehensive petition rather than piecemeal filings. Work with counsel to ensure the petition covers everything appropriate.

Consider prosecutor relationships. The prosecutor consent option for early filing and the requirement for prosecutor consent under Section 5 mean that prosecutor relationships affect outcomes. Some counties have prosecutors more amenable to expungement than others. Pre-filing discussions with the prosecutor's office can clarify whether favorable resolution is possible.

Document rehabilitation. For Section 4 and 5 cases where the court has substantial discretion, comprehensive rehabilitation evidence (stable employment, education, community involvement, treatment completion, etc.) substantially affects outcomes.

Complete financial obligations first. All fines, fees, restitution, and court costs must be paid before expungement is available. This is non-negotiable.

Use anti-discrimination protections. When expungement is granted, the anti-discrimination provision provides real protection against employment and housing discrimination. Document any potential violations and pursue civil remedies when appropriate.

Engage experienced counsel for complex cases. Section 1 (arrests) and Section 2 (misdemeanors) cases are often procedurally manageable for self-representation. Section 3-5 cases (felonies) typically benefit substantially from professional representation. Indiana expungement attorneys typically charge $750-$3,500 depending on case complexity.

Watch the timing. Filing too early (before waiting period elapses without prosecutor consent) results in denial and uses up the one-bite opportunity for that category. Filing too late means continued exposure to background check problems.

Don't assume federal effects. Indiana state-level expungement doesn't directly affect federal background checks, federal firearms rights, or federal immigration consequences. The relief is state-level only.

Coordinate with other relief options. For some Indiana residents, alternative paths (gubernatorial pardon, post-conviction relief based on innocence, etc.) may apply in addition to or instead of expungement. Comprehensive case evaluation considers all available options.

For Indiana residents whose records affect current opportunities, the Second Chance Law provides meaningful paths to relief through the five-section framework. The combination of expungement remedies with the anti-discrimination protection under §10 provides substantive benefits beyond what most state frameworks offer. The work for Indiana residents is in understanding which section applies to each case, planning comprehensively given the one-bite rule, meeting all procedural requirements, and following through with the petition process. For cases that succeed, the framework provides substantial relief from the consequences of past records, with the anti-discrimination provision providing additional protection that enhances the practical value of expungement.

Emeka O. OkaforLemon Law & Consumer Protection

Emeka covers consumer protection law, lemon law claims across all 50 states, and warranty disputes. He maps the procedural steps — notice, repair attempts, arbitration, buyback — that decide whether a claim succeeds.

Reviewed by Bridget Vogel, JD
General information, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Laws and procedures vary by state and change over time, and every situation is different. Confirm current rules with the relevant agency or court, and consult a licensed attorney or other qualified professional before acting on anything you read here.

More in Expungement
Expungement11 min
Does expungement show on background checks: how sealed records affect employer screenings, the FCRA obligations on background check companies, the FBI database gap, and what to do when an expunged record still appears
Emeka O. Okafor · reviewed by Bridget Vogel, JD
Expungement11 min
Ban the Box and fair chance hiring laws: the federal Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act, the 37+ state laws, how delayed inquiry rules work, and what employers and applicants need to know
Emeka O. Okafor · reviewed by Bridget Vogel, JD
Expungement11 min
The Clean Slate movement: how automatic expungement is replacing petition-based record relief, which states have adopted it, what triggers automatic sealing, and why the petition gap matters
Emeka O. Okafor · reviewed by Bridget Vogel, JD